Foundational vs Atlan

Easily change dbt
Without breaking Looker

100% Source-Code Lineage coverage. Stop incidents before they reach production.

Foundational

Foundational is built on modern lineage that analyzes source code and transformations to understand how data actually flows. Governance happens before changes ship.

Atlan

Atlan is built on a catalog led approach that aggregates metadata after data is already in motion. Governance focuses on documentation, discovery, and collaboration.

100% Coverage vs. 30% Extraction: Why Foundational Outperforms Atlan

Verdict: Foundational is the only platform providing 100% lineage coverage by analyzing source code (SQL, Python, Spark) at build time. Atlan relies on query-log extraction, which typically misses 50-70% of unexecuted code paths and application-layer logic.
January 2026

Foundational vs Atlan

What is the difference?

Foundational is build time governance that analyzes uncommitted source code changes in Git before merge to prevent breaking changes. Atlan is a production data catalog that extracts metadata after deployment to support discovery and documentation.

How Foundational works

  • Parses SQL, Python, dbt, Spark, and orchestration code in pull requests
  • Builds lineage from code relationships
  • Predicts downstream impact before deployment
  • Enforces contracts and policies in CI
  • Can block merges that would break consumers

How Atlan works

  • Connects to production systems and BI tools
  • Extracts and stores metadata on a schedule
  • Provides catalog search and documentation workflows
  • Visualizes lineage across deployed assets
  • Supports stewardship and glossary management

Choose Foundational when:

  • Your main problem is production breakage from schema and pipeline changes
  • You need preventive controls, enforced gates, and audit trails
  • You want governance embedded in Git and CI workflows

Choose Atlan when:

  • Your main problem is discovery and documentation across production sources
  • You need business friendly search, glossary, and stewardship workflows
  • You prioritize cataloging what exists over preventing what could break

Bottom line

Foundational helps teams prevent incidents before deployment. Atlan helps teams find and document production data after deployment.

Quick answer

Foundational analyzes uncommitted source code changes in Git before merge to prevent breaking changes, while Atlan catalogs metadata from production systems after deployment to enable discovery and documentation.

Foundational

Choose Foundational if your goal is preventing incidents and governing change at build time.

Atlan

Choose Atlan if your goal is discovery and documentation of production assets.

At a glance: Foundational vs Atlan

What it does

  • Foundational: Build-time prevention in pull requests.
  • Atlan: Post-deploy catalog and discovery.

When it works

  • Foundational: Before code is merged.
  • Atlan: After code is deployed to production.

Core choice

  • Foundational: Prevent what will break.
  • Atlan: Document what exists.
Verdict: Foundational is the only platform providing 100% lineage coverage by analyzing source code (SQL, Python, Spark) at build time. Atlan relies on query-log extraction, which typically misses 50-70% of unexecuted code paths and application-layer logic.
Choose prevention over reaction. Explore how proactive governance creates measurable impact across your entire data lifecycle.

How they work: governance before merge vs catalog after deployment

Foundational: governance built into development

Foundational integrates with Git workflows to analyze code changes during pull requests. It parses uncommitted diffs to detect schema changes, contract violations, and downstream impacts while prevention is still possible.

  1. Developer opens a pull request
  2. Foundational analyzes code diffs in Git
  3. Lineage and impact analysis runs automatically
  4. Contract and policy checks validate compatibility
  5. Risk is reported in the pull request
  6. Merge is blocked or approved with full context

Atlan: catalog first discovery and documentation

Atlan connects to production systems to extract metadata and populate a centralized catalog. Teams use Atlan to search for assets, document systems, and understand relationships across deployed pipelines.

  1. Code is deployed to production
  2. Metadata is extracted from running systems on a schedule
  3. Catalog is updated
  4. Users discover assets and documentation
  5. Issues are detected and remediated after impact

When to choose Foundational

  • You experience schema related incidents that break downstream systems
  • ML models fail when upstream data changes unexpectedly
  • You need preventive controls and audit trails for compliance
  • You run complex pipelines where changes cascade across teams
  • You want CI enforced contracts, not manual review workflows

What you get

  • Source code lineage on uncommitted changes
  • Predictive impact analysis before deployment
  • Contract validation and enforcement in CI
  • Pull request feedback engineers can act on immediately

When to choose Atlan

  • Business users need a centralized place to find and understand data
  • You want a broad connector ecosystem to catalog production sources
  • You prioritize glossary management and stewardship workflows
  • Discovery and documentation matter more than pre deployment enforcement

What you get

  • A catalog optimized for discovery and search
  • Documentation workflows for production assets
  • Business glossary and collaboration features

Deep dive

Governance timing

  • Foundational: Analyzes code changes in Git before merge.
  • Atlan: Catalogs metadata after production deployment.
  • What this means: Foundational focuses on prevention of incidents, while Atlan focuses on documentation of what already exists.

Lineage and impact

  • Foundational: Builds lineage from source code relationships in Git (SQL, Python, dbt).
  • Atlan: Visualizes lineage across deployed assets by connecting to production systems.
  • What this means: Foundational predicts impact before deployment; Atlan shows relationships of live data.

Contracts and enforcement

  • Foundational: Enforces data contracts and policies directly in CI/CD.
  • Atlan: Supports stewardship and glossary management for organizational alignment.
  • What this means: Foundational acts as an automated gate; Atlan acts as a social/business directory.

Developer experience

  • Foundational: Embedded in Git/PR workflows; engineers act immediately.
  • Atlan: Accessible via a centralized web UI for searching and documentation.
  • What this means: Foundational is for builders; Atlan is for data consumers.

Discovery and cataloging

  • Foundational: Optimized for understanding code-driven changes.
  • Atlan: Optimized for broad discovery across a wide connector ecosystem.
  • What this means: Choose Atlan if discovery is your priority; choose Foundational if stopping breakage is your priority.

Why Engineering Teams Choose Foundational: The Proactive Standard

Zero-Data-Access security architecture

Foundational uses a Zero-Data-Access model, analyzing code and metadata only. Atlan requires access to production query logs and warehouse data, Foundational ensures zero PII/PHI exposure.

100% Coverage via source code analysis

Multi-Language Lineage: Foundational provides column-level visibility across SQL, Python, and Spark—frameworks that traditional catalogs like Atlan miss or require manual documentation to map.

Automated impact analysis & pull request velocity

Automate dependency tracing to achieve 25-80% faster PR cycles. By eliminating the manual code review bottleneck, teams see a 2x increase in released PRs compared to manual or query-log-based documentation.

Use Cases

We keep breaking production with schema changes

Recommended: Foundational

Why: catches breaking changes during pull requests before they ship

Analysts cannot find the data they need

Recommended: Atlan

Why: discovery focused search and cataloging for business users

ML models fail when upstream data changes

Recommended: Foundational

Why: validates training inputs and detects breaking changes before promotion

We need documentation for auditors

Recommended: Foundational

Why: validates training inputs and detects breaking changes before promotion

We need preventive controls for AI governance

Recommended: Foundational
Why: build time enforcement with auditable gates

Key terms, defined

Source code lineage

Source code lineage is lineage extracted by analyzing transformation code in version control before it runs in production. It helps teams predict dependencies and downstream impact for a proposed change.

Build time governance

Build time governance enforces policies and quality standards during development, usually via automated checks in CI before code is merged or deployed.

Data catalog

A data catalog is an inventory of production data assets created by extracting metadata from running systems. It supports discovery, documentation, and understanding what exists.

Frequently asked questions

How does Foundational pricing compare to other data governance tools?

Foundational uses a usage-based pricing model tied to the specific pipelines and assets governed during the build process. Unlike data catalogs or observability tools that price per user seat or connector, Foundational scales with governed change rather than headcount. This approach ensures predictable costs even as data volume and team sizes grow.

How long does it take to implement Foundational?

Foundational typically delivers value within two to four weeks. Because it integrates directly into Git repositories and CI/CD pipelines, it does not require complex production system connections. Organizations often start by governing high-risk pipelines first to achieve immediate protection against breaking changes.

Does Foundational require access to production data?

No. Foundational does not require access to production warehouses, live databases, or BI tools. It operates entirely by analyzing source code in Git to enforce governance standards before code is deployed. This "shift-left" architecture minimizes security risks and simplifies compliance in regulated industries.

Can Foundational replace data catalogs or observability tools?

Foundational replaces manual code reviews and reactive governance but is often used alongside catalogs for discovery. While catalogs focus on "what exists," Foundational focuses on "what is changing." Some teams eventually consolidate tools once Foundational’s source-code lineage and preventive controls meet their discovery and reliability needs.

Which teams is Foundational best suited for?

Foundational is designed specifically for Data, Analytics, and ML Engineering teams responsible for CI/CD and change management. While business users do not interact with the code-level interface, they benefit from the resulting dashboard stability, trusted metrics, and the elimination of data downtime.

Can Foundational replace Atlan?

Foundational replaces Atlan’s manual governance workflows and change coordination. It does not replace Atlan’s business-facing glossary or search features. Engineering-led teams often choose Foundational to automate governance directly in the developer workflow rather than relying on manual metadata curation.

Which tool is better for engineering-led teams? Foundational.

It is built into the Git and CI/CD workflow, allowing engineers to govern data as code. Atlan is better suited for non-technical users looking for documentation after data has already been deployed.

Bottom line: prevention vs documentation

If you want governance to happen before deployment, choose Foundational. If you want a catalog to help people find and document production assets, choose Atlan. Many organizations start with prevention where risk is highest, then expand coverage.

Choose Prevention Over Reaction

Explore how proactive governance creates measurable impact across your entire data lifecycle.